SEO Title:
Meta Description:
The US Navy is planning to rename a ship named after Harvey Milk, the openly gay civil rights icon and former San Francisco supervisor. The decision comes amid a broader review of military naming conventions and how they reflect the institution’s current values and historical context.
The ship in question, the USNS Harvey Milk, was launched in 2021 as part of a class of fleet replenishment oilers. Naming the ship after Milk was seen as a landmark move to recognize LGBTQ+ contributions to the military and American society at large. Milk, a Navy veteran himself, was honorably discharged in the 1950s before later becoming one of the first openly gay elected officials in the U.S.
Now, in a move that has sparked both criticism and support, the Navy has announced plans to rename the vessel. Officials say the change is part of an evolving strategy to ensure that ship names are “broadly reflective of military heritage and national values.” That wording has raised questions among LGBTQ+ advocates who view the renaming as a step backward in inclusion efforts.
Why the Renaming?
The Navy has not cited any misconduct or controversy surrounding Milk. Instead, sources within the Department of Defense point to a new internal policy that favors naming ships after geographical locations or military heroes with extensive combat records. The review process reportedly began last year and included a panel of historians, Navy leaders, and civilian advisors.
The decision to rename the Harvey Milk follows similar reviews across the military, including the removal of Confederate-linked names from Army bases and the reconsideration of other politically charged symbols.
Reaction From the Public
Public response has been mixed. LGBTQ+ advocacy groups and some veterans have condemned the move, calling it disrespectful to Milk’s legacy and the progress it symbolized. Others argue that naming ships after political figures—regardless of their background—invites unnecessary controversy.
Former Navy officers have weighed in, too. Some see the renaming as an overcorrection, while others support the Navy’s right to define its own naming strategy.
What Happens Next?
The Navy has not announced a new name for the ship yet, nor have they given a timeline for the official change. The process could take months and may involve Congressional review if opposition mounts.
In the meantime, the debate around the ship’s name is likely to continue, reigniting broader conversations about identity, legacy, and representation within the U.S. military.
