South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem is under scrutiny after attorneys pushed back against her explosive claim that a migrant threatened to assassinate former President Donald Trump. Legal experts argue Noem’s statement is not just misleading—it’s flat-out false.
This latest controversy adds to the heated national debate over immigration and political rhetoric, with many questioning whether Noem’s comments were aimed more at scoring political points than relaying facts.
What Noem Actually Said
In a recent interview, Noem claimed a migrant in South Dakota had openly said they wanted to “kill Donald Trump.” The remark quickly caught fire online, picked up by conservative media outlets as evidence of what they call President Biden’s “broken border policies.”
Noem used the alleged threat as an example of why she believes the federal government has failed to protect Americans from what she labels a wave of dangerous migrants.
The Legal Response: “No Evidence, No Credibility”
Attorneys representing migrants in South Dakota quickly responded, stating there is zero evidence supporting Noem’s claim. No police report. No arrest. Not even a documented threat.
“There’s no record of any such incident,” said one immigration attorney. “The governor’s statement appears to be completely fabricated.”
Critics argue that this kind of rhetoric has real consequences—fueling anti-immigrant sentiment and potentially putting vulnerable people at risk.
A Pattern of Political Theater?
This isn’t the first time Noem has made headlines for bold claims. Known for her hardline stance on immigration, she often echoes national Republican talking points about border security and crime.
However, the assertion that a migrant openly threatened to assassinate a former U.S. president, without any legal follow-up or supporting evidence, takes things to a new level.
Some are now calling for a retraction or even legal action, accusing Noem of defamation and fear-mongering.
Why It Matters
When public officials make unsupported claims—especially ones involving threats against national figures—it undermines public trust and raises ethical concerns.
The phrase “Attorneys say Noem falsely accused migrant of threatening to kill Trump” is now circulating widely online, fueling calls for accountability. The incident spotlights how easily misinformation can spread when facts take a backseat to politics.
Final Thoughts
The allegation is serious. But according to multiple legal experts, it’s also baseless. Until proven otherwise, it seems Gov. Noem has more explaining to do than the migrant she accused.
Stay informed, stay skeptical—and maybe take political soundbites with a grain of salt.
